Clarke refuses cash to update job figures
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Chancellor is refusing to provide extra funds to implement improvements to the discredited claimant count method of producing the unemployment figures.
A monthly labour force survey covering 60,000 people has received top- level backing as an alternative. But to provide the new figures would add pounds 8m to the cost of collecting the unemployment statistics. Kenneth Clarke is believed to have told official statisticians that they can only start to collect the more realistic figures if the cost can be saved from elsewhere in their budget.
The Office for National Statistics is due to announce its decision within the next two weeks. Officials suggest that the most likely choice is a cheaper half-way measure between the current figures and the preferred alternative of a full monthly survey of the labour market.
Tim Holt, director of the ONS, has always made it clear he shares the general view that the monthly claimant count measure of unemployment has been discredited by the number of changes made to the unemployment benefit system since 1979. Most of the changes, restricting the availability of benefit, have reduced the headline total.
A working party Dr Holt set up last summer recommended conducting the more reliable quarterly survey measure of unemployment every month, to provide a trustworthy alternative. Government statisticians believe the move will be essential to restore public confidence in the unemployment numbers.
Other supporters of a monthly survey include the Royal Statistical Society and the House of Commons Employment Select Committee. Both have concluded that the monthly claimant count is not widely trusted.
Even ministers acknowledge that there have been nine changes in definition which have affected the headline total, all except one reducing it.
The ONS has recently had to scale back planned improvements to its collection of figures on the service industries, which are only scantily covered by official statistics despite accounting for two-thirds of the economy, due to budget stringencies.
Insiders are convinced that if money is running short for such an important project, it will not be available for upgrading the quarterly unemployment measure to monthly.
Instead, monthly unemployment numbers could be calculated based on a small-scale survey to update the existing quarterly figures. This option would cost about pounds 1m.
The scene was set for an announcement that would disappoint statistics- users in the latest edition of the ONS publication, Labour Market Trends. A special article described improvements in the geographical coverage of the unemployment claimant count which, it said, would make that measure "an even more useful data set".
Whatever its limitations, the claimant count is timely, frequent, precise and instantly available, the article points out.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments