City watchdog plans much harsher penalties
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE WATCHDOG responsible for City of London traders yesterday unveiled plans to introduce far stiffer penalties for breaches of its rules. If the proposals from the Securities and Futures Authority (SFA) are accepted, penalties for firms that fall foul of the regulator could increase fourfold.
Individuals who breach SFA rules could find themselves with double the penalties they could expect to receive under the current regime.
The SFA says also it wants to "foster the notion that good compliance is good business" and is proposing that fines be reduced, or even waived altogether, if firms have good compliance procedures and notify the SFA of any breaches.
The watchdog said: "If a firm with adequate controls discovers an issue in a timely way and promptly informs the SFA, giving the full facts together with a proposed course of remedial action - including compensation where necessary - disciplinary action will be very much less likely."
The SFA proposals, released yesterday, listed additional factors that it believes should be taken into consideration when setting fines. These include the number of rule breaches, the time scale over which the breaches occurred, whether there was widespread wrongdoing throughout the firm and the means of the firm in question to pay fines.
Firms have until 30 April to respond.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments