City to examine BZW cash route
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Institutions said yesterday that they had agreed to participate in a detailed examination of a new technique for raising capital for companies, following a meeting at BZW last Friday.
BZW put forward a proposal aimed at resolving a dispute in the City about the future of shareholders' pre-emption rights which could also help fend off a threatened monopolies inquiry into the City's charges for capital-raising.
Richard Regan of the Association of British Insurers, called the meeting "constructive and productive". The institutions are to examine the proposal in more detail in a working group with BZW. The meeting included representatives of the National Association of Pension Funds.
BZW told the institutions that it was possible with its new proposals to sell shares through a book-building exercise while preserving the pre-emption right of existing shareholders to first refusal of new shares, pro rata to their existing holdings.
Book-building is an American import in which shares are marketed directly to all potential buyers, not just existing shareholders. Until now it has been seen as a direct attack on the British system of rights issues because under a book-building existing shareholders receive no special treatment. The two methods were seen as mutually exclusive.
Although the debate is about a technicality of corporate finance, it has split the City down the middle. Integrated investment banks want to use bookbuilding much more extensively.
But traditional merchant banks and most investing institutions have regarded bookbuilding as a way of undermining their pre-emption rights, and they claim it also brings much bigger fees to advisers.
However, there appear to be several unanswered questions about BZW's plans, including the impact on small shareholders and the size of the fees that would be charged to companies.
Another important technicality that the institutions want resolved is how trading in nil-paid rights would be preserved. Under the traditional system, the right to subscribe to an issue can have a value of its own that can be bought and sold without actually subscribing for the shares.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments