Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

City Talk: Heavy metals nettle JM

Richard Phillips
Saturday 06 December 1997 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Shares in Johnson Matthey responded well on the day it announced its interim results a week ago last Friday. Since then, though, they have slipped back to 532.5p from 553p on the day the results were unveiled. Scare stories about problems in its precious metals business revolving around the turmoil in South-east Asia are one reason for the decline. These rumours were probably generated by traders hoping to short the stock.

The results, however, were a clear indication of the group's sound health. First-half profits were up 14 per cent to pounds 58.2m. So why the company's shares remain on something approaching a 25 per cent discount to the market is a mystery.

More complex speculation has it that JM's role as a supplier to Intel could be under threat - in part either because of a slump in demand for computers, or the rise of the low-cost PC for less than $1,000 (pounds 597).

SBC Warburg Dillon Read sees earnings growth of 10 per cent, 20 per cent and 17 per cent over the next three years. On that basis, the shares remain a strong buy.

A newly quoted company of independent financial advisers (IFAs) is set to list on AIM shortly, raising pounds 5m of new money in the process. Inter- Alliance is coming to the market through an offer for subscription at 268p a share.

A nationwide firm of IFAs, Inter-Alliance hopes to see its registered employees rise to 1,500 over the next three years. At present it has eight offices, with 70 IFAs.

It also hopes to recruit heavily from the ranks of existing direct sales forces - a trend that matches the pattern of the industry as a whole.

There are pros and cons to investing in a company such as Inter-Alliance. On the one hand, it has an experienced management team, which could propel it towards rapid growth. However, any IFA who is seen cutting corners with clients brings down regulatory wrath, not just on the individual concerned, but also on the firm employing him or her.

DBS, another quoted firm of IFAs, has been fined severely for rule breaches.

Inter-Alliance's shares could show a lucrative return, but it's not for widows and orphans.

The elusive quality of the defence document in the bid by Bupa for Care First over the weekend, may give the impression of a side that has already thrown in the towel.

Bupa's offer, is, by any standards, generous. Few shareholders will feel able to resist the all cash offer at 150p.

Bupa says it can afford to pay this sort of money, because it can afford to take a long-term view. It is a curious irony that when companies say they are willing to do this, they are lambasted for paying over the odds. Bupa is impervious to such criticism, of course, because of its private status. It can do very much what it wants to do.

However, it would be understandable if there were some chief executives out there who rued the decision by Bupa not to bid for them.

The exit price on their share option packages would be unlikely to be matched by another bidder.

The only other option - a rival bid - is unlikely for that very reason. There were prospects former chief executive Chai Patel might be able to mount some sort of rival offer, but hopes of that are fading.

But if you are a Care First shareholder, better to be safe than sorry. Hang on to your shares, just in case of an improved offer.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in