City: Nuclear fallout
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Another civil servant to have made his name out of privatisation is John Guinness (gas and electricity). He's now chairman of British Nuclear Fuels, which you might have thought an even more unlikely candidate for privatisation than British Rail given the exceptionally dangerous and environmentally sensitive nature of what it does. Officially BNFL is agnostic on the issue of privatisation, but privately its management is desperate to escape from the dead hand of the public sector.
So what are its prospects? Theoretically BNFL is as easily privatised as any other business - in some respects a good sight more easily. It makes good profits, has a long-term international order book that would make most British companies green with envy, and a universally respected expertise in one of the world's biggest growth markets - nuclear waste management and decommissioning.
The fly in the ointment, however, is the Government's apparent inability to make its mind up on Thorp - the thermal oxide reprocessing plant at Sellafield. I've no wish to enter the environmental debate on Thorp, nor am I qualified to do so. But, from a business point of view, the consequences of preventing this pounds 4bn project from operating are dire. Some pounds 1.9bn has already been advanced by overseas customers - mainly Japanese utilities. If BNFL were prevented from going ahead with its contractual obligations, the Japanese would undoubtedly sue, exposing the taxpayer to an estimated pounds 5bn in costs and damages. The Government would be faced with a choice of horrible alternatives - default on pounds 1.9bn of advance payments with some of our most important trading partners, or cough up the damages. Alongside this, Mr Guinness's dream of one day privatising BNFL would become a forgotten victim of the fallout.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments