Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

City jitters over Labour tax plans

Richard Halstead
Saturday 05 April 1997 17:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The City fears that Labour may be forced to raise company taxes in a move that could leave businesses and pension funds around pounds 12bn a year worse off and prompt a stock market sell-off.

Leading figures have warned that a Labour government, faced with revenue shortfalls from its 1998-99 Budget onwards, might raise corporation tax by up to two percentage points.

The City is already sceptical about the gap between Chancellor Kenneth Clarke's current tax and spending plans in last year's Budget, a minefield that Labour will have to negotiate.

As a result, City economists believe employers' national insurance contributions may also rise, to take the place of higher basic or upper rates of personal income tax, which shadow Chancellor Gordon Brown has pledged he will not raise in the lifetime of the next parliament.

Broker Merrill Lynch calculates that two points on corporation tax - lifting it to 35 per cent - and 1 per cent on employer's national insurance contribution rate would net pounds 5bn, without any huge loss of popularity.

"Labour is caught between the devil and the deep blue sea when it comes to getting more tax money, and I think they see business as a soft target that will not lose them votes," another City economist said.

Labour, however, vigorously denied that it would raise tax on companies, if it wins the election.

"We have said we will review the corporate and capital gains tax regimes to promote greater long-term investment in the manifesto, and that is what we will do," said Charlie Whelan, Mr Brown's press secretary.

"There is nothing in our plans that calls for more tax."

Labour's plans for business, he added, would be fleshed out this week with the publication of the party's business manifesto.

The complexity of the corporate tax system, however, would mean that changes would not materialise before Mr Brown's scheduled Budget next March, at least.

The City's fears came as Alistair Ross Goobey, the outspoken head of the pounds 30bn Hermes pension fund, warned that scrapping tax credits on share dividends would lead to sharp falls in the value of UK equities.

The credits, which arise from advance corporation tax (ACT), can be reclaimed by tax-exempt organisations such as pension funds. The elimination of ACT would raise between pounds 6bn and pounds 8bn, according to the Institute for Fiscal Studies.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in