City File: Show stopper
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Blenheim Group, which runs exhibitions all over Europe, is one of the most successful stock market performers of recent years. Of course there are doubters, and Blenheim's accounts, published last week, may fuel some of those worries.
Courageously, Blenheim writes off all good will on its acquisitions of exhibition companies. By 31 December 1992 it had written off pounds 324m, leaving it with a deficiency in shareholders' funds of pounds 135m. This may look bad, but it should not be a problem if the values of the exhibitions hold up and can be justified by their income.
But can they? There are dark mutterings that Blenheim paid too much for its French exhibitions businesses. And the accounts show that Blenheim made operating profits of pounds 58.3m in 16 months, an annualised return on assets of 13.5 per cent. This seems healthy, but is it enough to justify Blenheim's exalted rating?
(Graph omitted)
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments