Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

City: Drugs worry

Richard Thomson
Saturday 03 April 1993 17:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THERE is usually more to the drugs industry than meets the eye. The news that AZT is not effective in delaying the development of Aids in HIV-positive patients almost certainly came as more of a shock to Wellcome shareholders, who saw the shares plunge 85p on Friday, than it did to many HIV patients themselves.

Particularly in the US, which accounts for most sales of Retrovir - Wellcome's brand name for AZT - there is already a surprising level of sophistication among HIV and Aids sufferers, and it is constantly growing. Aids groups have become experts both in the drugs on offer and those being developed. They attend drug company presentations on research. Aids newsletters with the latest medical developments are commonplace.

With nothing much left to lose, HIV and Aids patients are deciding in growing numbers to take part in clinical trials of the legions of new drugs being developed by other drugs companies, rather than take Retrovir, a known quantity. Retrovir, after all, held only limited benefits, so there are attractions in trying out untested drugs in the hope of finding something more effective.

The difficulties of marketing the drug to such a well-educated public partly explains why sales of Retrovir were already slowing before the latest study on its effectiveness was published. Sales of the drug rose by only 14 per cent last year - far from the huge increases that Wellcome's supporters had been predicting.

The price of Retrovir, meanwhile, has fallen by a third since it was introduced, and the recommended dosage has more than halved.

Ironically, this is quite good news for Wellcome shareholders. If Retrovir has been overrated as a wonder drug, the stock market's reaction last Friday was overdone. With the sector growing increasingly nervous as it waits for Hillary Clinton's healthcare reforms in the US, big price swings have become commonplace and Wellcome's shares should regain most of what they lost.

In the longer term, however, the company is looking short on promising new products. That, not Retrovir, is what the shareholders should be worrying about.

Jeremy Warner is on holiday

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in