City & Business: The Navy lark
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.DEFENCE contractors have traditionally been great patrons of politicians.
For years British Aerospace and GEC have indefatigably wooed MPs and ex-Cabinet ministers. A seat on the board here, a consultancy there, a fact-finding trip everywhere. It's ironic that just as they want to call in some of those favours, the eyes of the country are riveted on each and every freebie.
Meanwhile the MoD is muddying the waters. On the one hand it has ruled out using its 'golden share' to block GEC's bid to take over VSEL. But it has then confused the issue by hinting that the deal could still be stymied on competition grounds. Yet the only trigger for a monopolies reference would be a complaint from VSEL's sole customer - which is, of course, the MoD.
This looks like politically expedient fudge. Everyone - the staff of VSEL, the shareholders of VSEL, GEC and BAe, and the Navy - deserves an unambiguous statement on what warship procurement policy now is. Over to you, Mr Rifkind.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments