Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

City & Business: Learning new lingo

Patrick Hosking
Saturday 06 August 1994 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

WE'VE been banging on in these pages for months about the potential dangers of derivatives - those mysterious financial instruments that allow investors to take huge positions in the currency, commodity, share and gilts markets. The deals worldwide are now measured in hundreds of trillions of pounds - far larger than the physical markets they're based on. Many companies have already taken a tumble, including Glaxo, Procter & Gamble, Metallgesellschaft and Allied-Lyons.

Yet company chairmen still trot out stock responses to questions about the risks their treasury departments take on derivatives. They 'never speculate', they 'minimise exposure' to adverse price movements, they are 'prudent and conservative' in their use of derivatives, and they only invest in instruments they understand.

These woolly claims are at best meaningless and usually misleading. But it is refreshing indeed to hear an expert saying as much. According to Neil Record, chairman of Record Treasury Management, these responses tell us virtually nothing about the true risks companies are taking on.

Mr Record is no alarmist scaremonger. A former Bank of England official, he worked in the Mars Group treasury before founding his own highly successful consultancy and currency management group. He now advises many of Britain's largest companies on treasury management.

'No chief executive will admit that his treasury speculates with his company's money,' he says. 'But plenty of treasuries do in practice take bets on currency and interest rates. I would go further and say that practically all the treasuries I have ever come across have done this in one circumstance or another.'

He believes the lack of understanding of derivatives will prove to be the undoing of some companies, banks and even governments. Much of the problem comes down to language. The only accurate, unambiguous and value-free way of explaining derivative positions is mathematics - mathematics of a complexity understood by no chief executives and practically no finance directors.

'While this state of innumeracy exists, then brace yourselves for more disasters,' he warns. Food for thought.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in