City & Business: Chunnel bicker
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A NEAR-MIRACLE occurred last week. Eurotunnel successfully raised pounds 743m in extra loans and got its long-awaited pounds 858m rights issue underwritten. The Channel tunnel project, which would have run out of cash next month, is flush again, at least for a year or two.
You might think Eurotunnel's advisers would be celebrating a breathtaking financial coup, not to mention the pounds 42m they've trousered in fees. Not a bit of it. Instead they are bickering bitterly aboutwho should take the credit.
No one is saying anything publicly, of course, but the row goes like this: Swiss Bank Corporation is claiming the laurels because it shouldered the biggest share of the underwriting - a whopping 31.5 per cent, exposing itself to a pounds 270m liability before passing on the risk to sub-underwriters.
An outrageous distortion of the truth, say the other joint managers, S G Warburg, Morgan Grenfell and Banque Indosuez. Far from saving the day, they say, Swiss Bank almost sank the entire deal by demanding (and eventually getting) favourable treatment at the sub-underwriting stage.
Swiss Bank has had a bumpy relationship with Eurotunnel ever since it elbowed its way into an advisory role after patching up the long-running dispute between its client Transmanche Link, the tunnel builders, and Eurotunnel.
It has carved out a reputation for aggressive deals over the past 18 months, poaching the customers of more traditional City houses either by under-cutting on price or by innovative deal design. Nor is it afraid of pinching other banks' ideas.
Its audacious approach has, according to your point of view, been either a breath of fresh air in the fuggy, clubby City, or a dangerously destabilising influence. Whichever, I suspect nothing short of a bloody nose is going to stop Swiss Bank's thundering rampage across the City.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments