Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

City: Bad dog

Jeremy Warner
Saturday 11 July 1992 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

WHAT hope for self-regulation in the City now? Not much, judging by the latest turn of events in the Maxwell affair. Last week the Securities and Investments Board admitted grave deficiencies in Imro's handling of the Maxwell pension funds. Well fancy that. It has been obvious since we first learnt of the enormity of the Maxwell scandal that Imro's handling of the pension funds fell a long way short of what might reasonably be expected of a watchdog organisation.

Sure, this was a wholly exceptional case, and, sure, there are shortcomings in the law which need correcting, as the Chancellor was quick to point out. But neither of these factors can explain away Imro's failings.

It is often said in defence of self- regulation when things go wrong that the Government could not have done any better in similar circumstances. Of that there can be little doubt. Experience tells us that if anything, governments tend to be rather worse.

For the ordinary Maxwell pensioner, however, the notion that fully-fledged statutory regulation of pension fund management might not have protected their funds from theft either is entirely irrelevant. The point is that if the Government had been directly responsible for the regulation of pension fund management, it would also have been accountable and liable for the grand theft that occurred. As it is there is nobody prepared to pick up the tab - neither the Government nor the City.

The failure of self-regulation in this case is not so much that Imro was deficient in preventing Maxwell from plundering the funds but that apparently no one can be held liable for it. The Government's response thus far has been lamentable. Unprepared to accept any responsibility for what went wrong it has resorted to asking Sir John Cuckney to go around the City, cap in hand, asking its various institutions to accept a 'moral responsibility' and make a charitable donation. It's not surprising that no one takes the initiative too seriously. Certainly the City doesn't.

The City fought tooth and nail against statutory regulation and with a sympathetic government in power eventually won the argument. With the Maxwell affair, the self-regulatory organisations that were set up as an alternative messed up on a gigantic scale. But is the City prepared to clean up the mess by providing adequate compensation? You bet it's not.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in