Charity hospitals to sue over PPP chief's remarks on safety
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.CHARITY hospitals are set to bring a libel action against PPP, Britain's second largest health insurer, over what they claim are defamatory comments made by its chief executive.
The Federation of Charity Hospitals yesterday said it was consulting its lawyers over remarks by Peter Owen, chief executive of PPP, that allegedly implied some of its members' hospitals were unsafe.
Mr Owen was asked by a policyholder at PPP's AGM to say how he decided which hospitals would be ditched from its list of care providers.
Mr Owen replied: "There is a very rigorous process that is gone through with all of the hospitals in all the areas where we ascertain the levels of safety at the hospital and the range of services they can provide, and it is on that basis that we make the choice."
The federation, which represents 65 per cent of hospitals in the charity sector, said the implication of the remarks was that member hospitals which had been de-listed by PPP were unsafe.
Gerald Pilkington, chief executive of the federation, said: "This is a shocking statement and was made to a subscribers' meeting where the public were present. We have no doubt this is defamatory about our members and we will take whatever steps are necessary."
In the last two years, tension has risen between private medical insurers and the hospitals they use. The insurers are desperate to cut costs in order to contain a rise in premiums of 3.5 per cent a year above inflation.
Insurers such as PPP have introduced "network initiatives". Under these schemes, the insurer will only cover treatment at a specially selected network of private hospitals. Excluded hospitals face the prospect of losing a large chunk of their annual income.
John Neville, a spokesman for PPP, declined to comment on the threat of a libel action. But he said the network initiatives were merely introducing market discipline to private hospitals.
"Our initiatives address the serious over-capacity of private hospitals which means the charges are unnaturally high because they are subsidising unoccupied beds," he said.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments