Celltech profits delay
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Celltech said yesterday that the failure of its lead drug for septic shock would mean the group would now not be profitable until 2000, two years later than expected.
However, Peter Fellner, chief executive, said the group's follow up treatment for the bowel condition, Crohn's disease, would replace at least a third of the value the company had lost after it was forced last week to abandon the sepsis drug, which was being developed in partnership with Bayer.
Dr Fellner said Bayer had returned the rights to the Crohn's disease drug and that Celltech had begun discussions with companies specialising in the gastrointestinal field.
He said that he expected to sign up a licencing partner on more favourable terms than with Bayer. "Septic shock was first, second and third on Bayer's list of priorities. Bayer had only agreed to develop the Crohn's drug on condition that the sepsis drug worked."
Dr Fellner said that pivotal trial data on the group's leukaemia drug being developed with American Home Products was expected this year.
The group said that the value would also come from other more early stage drugs including a new approach to the treatment of asthma. Dr Fellner said that the group had five or six years cash left at current burn rates. He added that the septic shock episode validated the group's strategy. "You can't run a pure biotech with low risk products and we do have high risk and innovative drugs. But we try to balance that with a low risk financial strategy, by having major partners who take on the costs of research."
Results for the six months to 31 March, announced yesterday, showed that the group had pounds 41m cash. Underlying losses rose from pounds 5m to pounds 5.9m after research costs climbed pounds 1.5m higher to pounds 10m.
The group's shares, which were over 600p before last week's announcement, firmed 4.5p to 338.5p.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments