Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

CBI opposes sweeping reform of pensions

Paul Durman
Sunday 13 December 1992 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE Confederation of British Industry does not believe any fundamental reforms are needed in reponse to the Maxwell pensions debacle, limiting its demands to effective regulation within the existing system, writes Paul Durman.

In its response to Professor Roy Goode's review of pension law, the CBI is anxious to avoid imposing additional costs on employers or restricting their 'flexibility' over the pensions they provide to their employees.

The CBI said it 'understands and sympathises with public concern about the implications of such a serious breach of pension scheme security, but believes the Maxwell revelations must be set against the good record of around 460,000 occupational pension schemes, with assets of around pounds 320bn covering 11 million people'.

Sir Brian Corby, the CBI's deputy president, said the organisation recognised the strong pressure for a pensions compensation scheme. 'If such a scheme is introduced it should be in respect of fraud only and should not cover poor investment or underfunding,' he said.

The deadline for submissions to Professor Goode is tomorrow.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in