Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Case of mutual misunderstanding

Maria Scott
Saturday 28 August 1993 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE British have little understanding of the word 'mutual' as it is applied to financial institutions, according to research commissioned by Lautro, the life insurance regulator. The study followed protests over the Scottish Mutual life company retaining that name even though it became a proprietary company after its takeover by Abbey National.

Mutual insurers are owned by their policyholders, writes Maria Scott, and often claim that they offer better value to investors because profits are for their benefit rather than for shareholders. But while many mutuals figure prominently in investment performance league tables, mutuality is no guarantee of superior performance.

Colin Hawtin, head of policy at Lautro, said it planned to draw up marketing rules to ensure that proprietary companies using the word mutual in their names do not mislead customers. He added that he did not think Scottish Mutual's use of the word was an issue for investor protection. 'We don't think Scottish Mutual is misleading the public. We don't think the consumer knows what mutuality is,' he said.

Lautro's research was conducted by Professor Bob Carter of the University of Nottingham School of Management. He surveyed insurers and commissioned consumer research. Stephen Phillips, marketing manager of National Mutual Life, which protested about Scottish Mutual's name, said: 'We should make sure that people do understand what the word mutuality means.'

Chris Davidson, compliance officer with Scottish Mutual, said the company wanted to keep the name because it was known to financial advisers. He said the company's marketing literature makes it clear it is a proprietary company.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in