Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Care First shareholders get behind Patel

The resignation of the chairman of Care First may not be enough to head off a revolt by shareholders, writes Sameena Ahmad.

Sameena Ahmad
Wednesday 17 September 1997 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Care First could be facing a shareholder revolt following a board decision not to reinstate Chai Patel, the group's former chief executive, who walked out last month.

Succumbing to shareholder pressure, Keith Bradshaw, executive chairman, will step down immediately to non-executive chairman.

However, Mr Bradshaw, whose reluctance to give up control led to Mr Patel's departure, becomes acting chief executive pending a replacement.

In a carefully worded statement released yesterday after the market closed, Care First said that the board had unanimously voted that Mr Bradshaw resign as executive chairman and had "further agreed" not to reinstate Mr Patel. However it is understood that two executive directors, Tony Heywood, business development director, and Mr Patel himself voted for Mr Patel's reappointment and against Mr Bradshaw's role as acting chief executive.

The board vote came after meetings yesterday with the group's advisers, Collins Stewart and SBC Warburg.

Their report found that shareholders wanted either to reinstate Mr Patel and get rid of Mr Bradshaw completely or have Mr Bradshaw become non-executive chairman.

While Mr Patel was told that "a majority" of shareholders did not seek his reinstatement, the report did not indicate levels of support for each option.

An independent source called the news a compromise. "A large number of shareholders are very unhappy that Chai has gone. Many of them have talked about forcing an EGM. It is now just a question of whether they can organise themselves."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in