Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Car duty call will be real test: Rupert Cornwell reports from Washington on protectionist pressure in the motor industry

Rupert Cornwell
Thursday 28 January 1993 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE swingeing steel tariffs have caused worldwide alarm that a new protectionist mood is afoot in Washington.

But a far clearer test of the Clinton administration's views on trade will be a demand for punitive duties on every imported car, about to be presented by the ailing US motor industry. That would involve tariffs on imports worth dollars 44bn (pounds 29bn) annually. By contrast, steel shipments to the US amount to just dollars 1.5bn.

Despite the international uproar, Wednesday's steel ruling was essentially a holdover from the Bush era, which the new administration had no power to stop. It was 'a mandated procedure, not a policy statement', Ron Brown, the new Commerce Secretary, said in a special statement accompanying the decision.

Pointers abound that the new president may stiffen the generally laissez faire approach to trade of George Bush. Any Democratic administration is more ready to listen to its natural constituency of organised labour, as it demands more protection of American jobs. Huge cuts being forced upon struggling corporations like IBM, Westinghouse and Boeing suggest big business too could favour stronger moves against perceived unfair practices by foreign competitors.

Bill Clinton has made it clear he sees international economic affairs as an integral part of national security. His chief economic adviser, Laura Tyson, is an unabashed advocate of government support for hi-tech sectors, and if neccessary 'managed trade' to foster their growth.

Although he has given few clues, Mickey Kantor, the new and untried US trade representative, is expected to take at least as tough a line as his Republican predecessor, Carla Hills.

The new administration's strategy will become plain from its stance in the Gatt and North American Free Trade Area (Nafta) negotiations. Further signs will come when Sir Leon Brittan meets Mr Kantor in Washington next month. Nothing, though, will be as revealing, or as potentially explosive, as the gambit from Detroit.

The big three car makers are already trying to persuade the Commerce Department to re-classify 'sport utility vehicles' (including Range Rovers from Britain) as light trucks, which would subject them to higher duties.

GM, Ford and Chrysler are not confirming their plans. But they are known to have prepared preliminary documents and enlisted big Washington law firms to press the case. The companies will try to prove that foreign cars are being sold here for less than in their domestic markets.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in