Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Cable firms take BSkyB dispute to DTI

Mathew Horsman
Tuesday 19 September 1995 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

UK cable companies have asked the Department of Trade and Industry to investigate the allegedly anti-competitive practices of BSkyB, the cable and satellite broadcaster owned 40 per cent by Rupert Murdoch's News Corp.

The move marks a fresh attack on what the cable companies see as BSkyB's abuse of its dominant position in the supply of pay-TV programming in the UK. A DTI spokesman said: "I can confirm that we have received representations from the cable companies. We are considering their request." He declined to elaborate.

The action follows two attempts by a group of smaller cable operators, led by Inter- national CableTel, to convince regulators to rein in BSkyB. The first, a formal complaint, was lodged with the Office of Fair Trading early this year. A similar request was later sent to the Competition Directorate in Brussels.

One industry source said: "This is a further fruitless attempt by the cable companies to monopolise the British communications industry by regulation rather than by initiative."

The cable operators believe BSkyB is guilty of anti-competitive behaviour in three areas: its control of the con- ditional access technology used to scramble and unscramble video signals; its dominance of capacity on the Astra satellite; and long-term supply contracts with programme suppliers, particularly Hollywood studios.

More particularly, they have complained about the rate card used to establish the prices of BSkyB programming broadcast on cable. Most of BSkyB's programming is available both on satellite and cable, with cable operators paying a premium. They argue that BSkyB has an effective monopoly on sports and film, the only programming that, in effect, drives the growth of pay-TV.

In addition, criticisms have been made about controversial contracts reached by BSkyB with the two biggest cable operators, Telewest and Nynex CableComms. Under these contracts, now being renegotiated at the request of the OFT, cable operators are allowed to buy Sky programming a la carte, rather than in bundles.

The contracts, signed in May, contained clauses restraining the cable operators from developing pay-per-view services in competition with BSkyB, and led to the dismantling of a cable committee established to develop such services.

The contracts, which the OFT found contained anti-competitive elements, are still under review, but the watchdog formally approved a revised version of the rate card last month over the objections of some cable companies.

In the latest action by the cable operators, the DTI is being asked to force further changes to the rate card, or to refer BSkyB to the Restrictive Practices Court. The cable companies are believed to be hoping that inaction from the DTI would spark a renewal of interest by the European Commission in BSkyB's practices.To date, the Commission has made it clear it views the squabble between BSkyB and the cable operators as a domestic issue.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in