Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Business Comment: Benefits pour in on Anglian investors

Wednesday 28 May 1997 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Here's a poser: what sort of business raises its dividend by twice the amount that profits have increased and then says its customers will have to foot the bill for the windfall tax? Tricky one, eh?

It never rains in Anglian Water country, or hardly ever, but it pours all the time if you are a shareholder. Yesterday the Anglian board sprayed another pounds 93m in the direction of shareholders, made millionaires out of the men who run Hartlepool Water and then pleaded poverty when it came to the windfall levy.

Clearly the water companies are either past caring or beyond shame. Or perhaps both. As the first water company to report, Anglian is in a difficult position. It is hard to set the pace for the rest of the sector while simultaneously explaining why the windfall tax breaches all the rules of natural justice.

But if Anglian supposes it can empty out the coffers before Gordon Brown gets there it is labouring under a terrible misapprehension. On the other hand, if it believes it is within its rights to pursue a legal challenge to the windfall tax then it shows a lamentable lack of judgement. There are many things wrong with the levy, as this column has repeatedly stated. But all governments have a right to raise tax revenue the way they see fit.

The argument that customers have done as well as shareholders out of privatisation of the water industry is also a flimsy one. Anglian may be one of the better performers - careful husbandry of resources means that it has never had a hosepipe ban despite being the driest part of the country. But customers have also paid for that with the highest water bills in the land.

Set against Anglian's objective of reducing dividend cover to two times earnings, the pounds 40m of efficiency savings and the pounds 2m it is providing to bale out customers having difficulties with their bills begins to look like a drop in the ocean.

The interesting question is whether those water companies which are even less deserving of sympathy will match the payouts on offer from Anglian. The betting is they will.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in