Bunhill: Vodafone to sponsor Derby
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.IT WAS a story after Jeff Randall's heart, for it combined the twin passions of the City editor of the Sunday Times: the City and racing. Vodafone, he was informed by a source, was to sponsor the Derby over the next three years to the tune of something over pounds 1m a year.
Randall's man Andrew Lorenz sought confirmation from Vodafone, which promptly denied the rumour. But Randall had also phoned Alan Parker (son of Sir Peter), senior partner of Brunswick, one of the City's leading public relations agencies.
Brunswick does not act for Vodafone, but does work for Sir Ernest Harrison, chairman of Racal, Vodafone's parent, and for the Racecourse Holding Trust. Parker refused to confirm or deny any of the possible sponsors, including Vodafone.
When Vodafone duly announced the sponsorship deal early last week Randall went nuclear. He even sent out a memo to his staff telling them not to deal with Brunswick but to deal direct with the firm's clients - a blue-chip list ranging from Barclays Bank to ICI. His basic attitude is: 'We would not have done this over one instance. We have decided that it is no longer in the interests of Sunday Times readers to have City and business news filtered through Brunswick.'
That's all he'll say in public, but apparently Randall was adding phrases like 'deeply pissed off . . . not a fit of pique, it was simply the straw that broke the camel's back'.
Apparently Randall was especially 'pissed off' because the matter did not concern price-sensitive information. Unlike a forthcoming rights issue or profits warning, it didn't really affect the shareholders or the employees - if it had, then Vodafone would have been entitled to discretion under the arcane rules that govern the relationship between journalists and PR agencies.
For his part, Parker is keeping even mummer, in accordance with his firm's maxim that 'we don't come between the client and the footlights'.
Both sides are taking the spat rather more seriously than Brunswick's clients.
One of them, Richard Power, director of corporate affairs at Forte, said simply: 'We're buying brains, not contacts . . . in normal circumstances, I prefer to deal direct with journalists . . . both Jeff and Alan are good friends of mine, and I hope they get together very soon.'
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments