Bunhill: Counting the costs of counsel
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.NEWS of a nice little row in the legal fraternity reaches me. At issue is the question of fees charged by Robert Venables QC, a leading tax barrister, for advising Nazmu Virani (shown at right), the former Control Securities boss.
Letters are flying back and forth between Venables, Garstangs, Virani's solicitors, and the Solicitors Complaints Bureau, which is adjudicating. In his submission, Venables claims his hourly rate of pounds 750 is not excessive.
'It also reflects the rate the market is prepared to pay me,' he says. 'While my clerk does not usually charge me out by the hour as such, an exception was made in 1992 in the case of a large project for a certain government which was happy to agree pounds 750 an hour.'
Memo to learned counsel: Virani is not a government. Further memo: Lend us a quid.
(Photograph omitted)
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments