Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Bunhill: City lawyers paying legal fees

Patrick Hosking
Saturday 22 January 1994 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

IT'S a delight to see City lawyers for once having to shell out astronomic legal fees rather than gathering them in.

The prestigious house of Allen & Overy, which blundered on a piece of technical advice to its client Queens Moat Houses, has agreed to shoulder the legal fees charged to QMH by its successor, the rival firm of Freshfields, to rectify the mistake.

The Allen & Overy partners, who advise Lucas, News International and Sun Life among others, are discovering it's not as pleasant receiving pounds 200-an-hour legal bills as dishing them out.

City lawyers have never come cheap. David Webster, deputy chairman of Argyll Group, once told me how he regularly saved pounds 1,000 for Argyll by the simple expedient of travelling to the lawyers' offices, rather than paying them for the time it took to cross town to see him.

One man with a robust attitude to the species is Alan Sugar. The Amstrad and Spurs chairman was in confident mood when he spoke on the subject last week at a seminar for corporate lawyers organised by the European Council of Legal Affairs.

Asked how he used his in- house lawyer, he replied: 'To be perfectly honest, I would tell him something and expect him to agree that I am right. If a lawyer tries to give me a bit of commercial advice, I just give him one of my daunting looks.'

M'learned friends got badly in the way at times, he confided, recounting how he and Rupert Murdoch handled them when negotiating a deal on manufacturing satellite dishes for Sky TV.

'Murdoch and I literally threw the lawyers out of the room when we did the satellite deal. Sometimes you can see the lawyers spoiling a deal for you, saying to each other something like, 'I'll send you a first draft and maybe we could be in touch next week'. No bloody way. I can guarantee that if Mr Murdoch had got out of the room, he would have got other advice and the deal might have fallen through.'

The bellicose Sugar was in fine form, but reserved his greatest bile for the people he negotiates with at the French electronics group Thomson - 'French monopolistic yobbos', he thundered. Hard to say whether it was their monopoly, their yobbishness or merely their Frenchness which most offended him.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in