BT loses out on payments from eight rivals after Oftel ruling
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.OFTEL, the telecommunications regulator, has waived payments that would have been made to BT by eight rivals to help make up losses in its local networks, writes Mary Fagan.
BT's losses from the lines between customers and local exchanges are estimated to be about pounds 1.5bn a year. The telecommunications group is not allowed to raise line rental and connection charges in line with costs.
Those granted waivers include Nynex and Telewest, US companies among the largest cable television firms in Britain; Videotron, a cable company; Energis, a subsidiary of the National Grid Company; and Colt and MFS, which offer telephone services in the City of London.
Don Cruickshank, director general of telecommunications, said he believed that, in principle, all BT's rivals using its wires to deliver calls should help to cover the deficit.
Payments from the eight would be waived for two years to help them establish a foothold in the market.
Mr Cruickshank said that, in granting waivers for the payments, he would favour companies building their own infrastructure and offering services not available from BT.
He said he estimated that the cost of the payments to BT were about 10 per cent of the total cost of offering a service.
They are in addition to the normal interconnection charges imposed for the use of BT's network.
He also criticised Mercury for attacking the deficit payments as a 'tax on success'.
Mr Cruickshank said the company had been unhelpful and shrill in its campaign, launched this week, against the payments.
He suggested that if Mercury had been more active in building its own local network it would pay less.
Mercury, in its 10th year, is paying BT its first access charge of pounds 35m this year and said that this would double next year.
BT said it understood Oftel's desire to help young companies become established. A spokesman added that, if Mercury did not want to pay, it should build its own network.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments