BT gives way over publishing charges
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.BRITISH Telecommunications yesterday went a large part of the way towards meeting the demands of the industry regulator, Oftel, for transparency in the charges it levies on other operators to use BT wires.
Replying to a consultative document issued in June by Oftel, BT agreed to publish a list of standard prices for connecting other telecom companies to its network.
Significantly, it also agreed to publish separate accounts for different parts of its businesses so that rival operators would know they are paying only the same as BT charges itself.
At present, rival operators such as Mercury and cable television companies are obliged to negotiate connection charges 'blind' - a time-consuming process that provides no guarantee that the price reached is a fair one. Under the new system, both the prices and the way BT arrives at them would become transparent.
However, BT rejected a number of Oftel's other proposals, including a recommendation that the regulator should have the power to alter BT's published prices if rival operators complain they are unfair.
BT said that the accounting separation should apply only to local delivery of calls and other monopoly services, arguing that Oftel's proposals did not reflect the development of competition.
BT also argued that Oftel's approach would encourage competitors to treat the BT network as a shared national utility, enabling them to reap the benefits of BT's investment programme on the same terms as BT.
In the consultative document, Oftel said that for accounting purposes BT should be split into BT-Network and BT-Retail - the arm that sells services to end users.
It also envisaged the separation being in place by the end of this financial year. In return, BT has offered to prepare separate, externally audited accounting statements for three activities - access, local network and other systems business.
Oftel sources suggested that BT appeared to have gone some way to meeting its proposals, but whether this would provide the basis for an agreement remained to be seen.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments