Brown defies critics of forecast
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.GORDON BROWN, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, has defended his economic forecasts, insisting the economy will slow slightly next year and then recover quickly.
In an interview with the BBC, the Chancellor was responding to widespread criticism of his latest forecasts announced in the pre-Budget report to Parliament early last week. The Government predicted that the UK economy could grow by as much as 1.5 per cent in 1999 and by 2.75 per cent in 2000, prompting claims that Mr Brown's figures are too optimistic in the face of a global economic slowdown.
Mr Brown repeated that there was "no denial'' of the difficulties the economy faces in the next year, and said the slump in Asia and Japan represented a risk to his forecasts. However, he said Britain was "better placed'' to weather the slowdown than it had been in previous recessions because the Government had eliminated public borrowing and, by making the Bank of England independent, brought inflation down.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments