Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

British Gas rapped over its accounts

Heather Connon
Monday 26 October 1992 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

BRITISH GAS has been criticised by the Financial Reporting Review Panel, the accounting watchdog, over the presentation of its accounts, writes Heather Connon.

Last year the group changed its year-end from March to December. But its accounts for 1991 reported a profit and loss account for the whole year, rather than the nine months from March as is required by the Companies Act 1985. While the nine-month figures were included as a note to the accounts, their location and content did not comply with the Act and no earnings-per-share figure was disclosed.

Nick St John, group chief financial accountant with British Gas, said the group had 'given a lot of thought' to the presentation and was anxious not to confuse its 2.1 million shareholders, many of whom bought shares through privatisation. It makes most of its profit in the first quarter, so presenting figures for the nine months to December does 'not reflect the performance of the company'.

The group has agreed to ensure that the comparative figures shown in the 1992 accounts comply with the Act.

The panel also forced SEP Industrial Holdings to change its policy on depreciation. In future, the group will depreciate freehold property.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in