Britain dearest for local phone calls, says report
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.BRITISH consumers pay more for local telephone calls than their European counterparts despite an average 2.5 per cent reduction in local call charges over the past year.
A standard three-minute call cost an average 11.5p in the UK between January 1992 and January this year, said the consultants National Utility Services.
This compares with less than 6p in the Netherlands and Italy and 7.3p in France. Consumers in Belgium and Germany pay less than 10p while those in North America are charged less than in almost any European country.
NUS criticised BT for continuing to increase exchange line rental and connection charges. Britain is the third most expensive country for these charges among the 10 nations surveyed.
BT has in the past justified high local call charges on the grounds that they cover losses on line rental and connections. However, it recently won approval to increase line rentals at a higher rate than other charges.
Andrew John, NUS's director of sales and marketing, said that volume discounts accounted for almost all of the overall reduction in charges. Discounting schemes favoured large companies, where BT faces most competition. Similar schemes have also been introduced by BT's rival, Mercury.
Mr John said: 'Should BT be allowed to maintain its policy of lower prices for volume users it will be no longer economical for emerging suppliers, especially the cable companies, to compete.'
He suggested that the regulator, Oftel, should consider restrictions on BT's price reductions as well as increases in charges, as regulators do in the US.
According to a recent report by the National Audit Office, BT still has 90 per cent of the overall telecommunications market and 99 per cent of the residential market.
Since the company was privatised, price reductions have favoured business users, it added.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments