Bridgeman warns against monopolies
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.John Bridgeman, the director general of fair trading, yesterday delivered his clearest warning that he would not permit the creation of national champions if it hampered competition in domestic markets.
His comments were seen as a warning shot across the bows of British Airways, which seeks approval for its alliance with American Airlines, and Bass, which proposes to take over Carlsberg Tetley to create Britain's biggest brewing group.
Speaking at a conference at Keele University, Mr Bridgeman dismissed the argument that Britain needed to create strong monopolistic businesses at home to compete in international markets.
"Firms which are subject to vigorous competition in their domestic markets are far more likely to be effective competitors abroad than those which are not subject to such pressures," he said. "The benefits of competition are indeed wider than the benefits of low prices and high-quality goods.
"Effective competition also provides the main stimulus for innovation, technological or otherwise, and provides the most powerful and enduring basis for the international competitiveness of UK firms.
"Equally, firms which are subject to competitive pressures are most likely to seek to gain competitive advantage through product or process innovation or through the development of new products."
He said that firms which did not face competition were under no pressure to cut prices, improve quality and service or innovate: "A strong competition policy aimed at maintaining domestic rivalry... is one of the pillars on which our economic future depends."
Three months ago, the President of the Board of Trade, Ian Lang, warned he would not tolerate national champions if they undermined competition at home.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments