Bottom Line: Soft option at WPP
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.WPP's management has once again shown a worrying degree of self-interest.
The struggling advertising group yesterday disclosed that Robert Lerwill, finance director, had been granted options over 321,981 shares at 52.5p each, almost a 30 per cent discount to the market price. The options can be exercised for four years beginning May 1996. At this level, Mr Lerwill, who is paying nothing for the option rights, is already sitting on a paper profit of about pounds 73,000.
Share options are meant to be a management incentive to enhance shareholder value in a company. It is a reward that should follow effort, not the other way round.
WPP's management has never been strong on following industry best practice. It is worth pointing out that both Martin Sorrell, WPP's controversial chief executive, and his colleague have five-year service contracts (with onerous termination terms) with the company. While much of corporate Britain has gone a long way to comply with the Cadbury report's recommendation for maximum three-year contracts, WPP's management continues to show scant regard for shareholders' interests.
Until WPP's shareholders stand up for themselves, they will not necessarily find their own interests coinciding with those of their managers.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments