Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Bottom Line: Ideas in Storehouse

Thursday 26 May 1994 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A DEPARTING boss can take the credit for his company's performance for the year after he leaves, according to Keith Edelman, chief executive of Storehouse since last August. That means the group's 48 per cent rise in pre-exceptional profit and the first dividend increase since it was cut from 8.8p to 5p in 1990, is all down to his predecessor, David Dworkin. Mr Edelman will be judged on where Storehouse goes from here.

On that, he has plenty of ideas. At BhS, he is working with suppliers to ensure that customers get what they want, but with shorter lead times. He is freeing more storage space for selling, planning to open stores in 60 unrepresented areas and boosting the marketing spend.

There is much to go for. At 400, its supplier numbers are similar to Marks & Spencer, but the amount put through each is less than a fifth as high - one reason its margins, although up from 6.3 to 7.5 per cent, are almost a third below Marks'. At Mothercare, it has succeeded in winning back business from upstarts like Adams, but the 3.6 per cent margin is still inadequate.

The question is, will he succeed? The City is clearly sceptical - on forecasts of about pounds 87m, it stands on a multiple of 15, compared with 16 for the sector as a whole. But given how intractable BhS's problems have proved in the past, such scepticism is justified.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in