Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Bottom Line: Brixton hits a wall

Wednesday 27 April 1994 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

YESTERDAY'S 6p drop in Brixton Estates' share price to 224p, following a 7 per cent rise in pre-tax profits to pounds 30m, provided further evidence of what a subjective matter valuing property companies is.

The first of the fickle measures the market uses - its ever-changing view of what constitutes a reasonable premium or discount to the underlying value of property portfolios - has moved sharply against the sector since the New Year.

Cautious comments from Brixton on potential tenant demand confirmed the wisdom of not paying a big premium to net assets until rental growth is a more realistic possibility than now. The downward movement of the share price towards yesterday's 192p net asset figure takes a justifiably less rosy view of future income.

The second measure - the value surveyors are prepared to put their name to, and perhaps justify in court in the next slump - is becoming increasingly more conservative.

One of the reasons Brixton's net asset value came in lower than expected was the 30 per cent divergence between Jones Lang Wootton's external view of the value of development sites and the directors' estimate last year.

Despite an 18 per cent fall in Brixton's shares from 274p since the sector's peak in January, they are still at a discount of about 5 per cent to NatWest Securities' estimate of net assets next December.

That compares with a 15 per cent discount for Slough, which shares a broadly industrial portfolio. Brixton is thought to be a better- managed company but until tenants start booking up extra space again that is already in the price.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in