Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Big players may join forces

Building Societies Conference 1995

Wednesday 17 May 1995 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Larger building societies are warming to the idea of banding together to protect themselves from hostile bids from the high-street banks.

Until recently, such alliances were a strategy thought to apply only to smaller societies. But the bigger organisations now want to be allowed to merge while keeping their own names in their separate business areas. This would be designed to prevent further hostile approaches by banks similar to the current attempt by Abbey National to take over National & Provincial.

A spokesman for Bradford & Bingley said the society was committed to the concept of mutuality. "The board haven't discussed the Hollick proposals yet, but we liked the message he put across," he said.

He argued that building society reserves were held by the management in trust for future generations of members, not just for the present membership.

A spokesman for the Birmingham Mid-Shires society said that being owned by, or becoming, a bank had many disadvantages. "Why should building societies give up the chance to be the jewels in the crown of the financial services world, noted for their friendliness and good service? Banks treat you as a number, building societies as a customer."

Adrian Coles, secretary of the Building Societies Association, said the biggest problem facing societies was that it was easy for banks to dangle cash inducements to society members to vote in favour of selling up.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in