Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Better off with a building society

Steve Lodge
Saturday 16 March 1996 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

WHEN is a windfall not a windfall? Life insurers could well disappoint yet again.

Announcements about billions of pounds of orphan assets and talk of takeovers might set the City alight. But the excitement factor for policyholders is more debatable.

As we report on page 3, past policyholders, even those with policies maturing now, may well miss out on the sharing out of so-called orphan assets, although it is these customers who have funded the treasure troves.

But current policyholders shouldn't sip too much bubbly either. True, they may get a bonus they weren't otherwise expecting. But pure consumerists might ask why shareholders should get anything.

Furthermore, the policyholders who stand to benefit from these special bonuses are those whose returns are at the discretion of insurers. It remains to be seen whether the magicking up of orphan assets isn't just an accounting exercise as far as returns to individual policyholders go. Might special bonuses be offset by falls in normal bonuses? Might policyholders just be watching their money switch pockets?

Similar questions could be asked about the bonuses likely to flow from some takeovers among insurers.

Moreover, most of these windfalls seem set to come through in bonuses added to existing policies - rather than cash or shares - and therefore are not accessible until you cash in that policy. (Norwich Union's likely flotation may well be an exception.) That and the fact that life insurance policies that might benefit from windfalls tend to be long-term commitments should be good reason for not taking out policies simply in the hope of a windfall.

As ever, the world of life insurance looks as clear as mud. Windfall hunters should stick to building societies.

To help, Members for Conversion, an action group set up by out-of-work butler Michael Hardern to pressure building societies to pay windfalls to their customers, has produced a free-bar-postage Carpetbaggers' Guide which includes contact telephone numbers for 40 societies. Mr Hardern says the hope is to make pounds 20,000 from savings account stakes totalling pounds 4,000. Call 0171-255 1079.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in