Banks play safe on derivatives
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Among the examples cited by derivatives specialists, NatWest Markets is believed to have told two important clients, both of which are FT-SE stocks, that it no longer wishes to deal with them because of the risk of losses.
The two companies removed from the NatWest list are both said to have had inadequate control systems that risked serious financial damage - and one suffered actual losses - from derivatives dealing.
Banks are now routinely examining their clients' internal control systems, assessing whether the management's motives for investing in derivatives are hedging or speculation.
Companies that are speculating as a deliberate policy require much higher internal standards of control.
The concerns have been heightened by a Procter & Gamble lawsuit in the US, followed by what is beginning to look like a deluge of litigation over the $1.5bn derivatives losses by Orange County in California.
US investors that lose money on derivatives have in a number of cases blamed the banks and securities houses that sold them the products for misinformation or selling inappropriate investments.
Although banks are still insisting on the principle of caveat emptor where professional investors are concerned, there is a growing realisation that losses by customers could blacken the image of the derivatives business and encourage greater government regulation on both sides of the Atlantic.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments