Bank rescue detail sought by Labour
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.LABOUR yesterday called on the Chancellor to reveal the full extent of the Bank of England's rescue operations in mid-1991 to head off a potential banking crisis.
The Bank disclosed on Thursday that it had put into place a lifeboat operation to support several small banks having difficulty obtaining funds. The operation came in the wake of the BCCI scandal in the summer of 1991, which seriously unsettled the international financial community.
Although the Bank does not usually disclose such sensitive operations, it went public this week after questions were raised in Parliament. The Bank has not offered any details on how many banks or how much money was involved. It said on Thursday it had used its own money, without a government guarantee, to support 'a few small banking institutions'.
Alistair Darling, Labour's City spokesman, called on Norman Lamont to make a statement on the exact nature of the support. 'I want to know how much was spent and where the support came from,' Mr Darling said.
He also wanted to know how many institutions were assisted and whether there was any money outstanding. 'There is no reason why the Chancellor cannot now make a statement. The public has a right to know,' he said.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments