Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Bank 'learnt lessons' from BCCI

Thursday 29 October 1992 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE GOVERNOR of the Bank of England, Robin Leigh-Pemberton, said last night that the Bank had lessons to learn from the Bank of Credit and Commerce International affair, but again rejected allegations that the Bank was involved in a cover-up.

'I totally reject the offensive and wholly unfounded allegations . . . that the Bank was somehow party to a cover-up, or colluded with BCCI, or even that our officials took bribes,' Mr Leigh- Pemberton told the annual Lord Mayor's banquet in London.

He said that if BCCI had been closed during 1990 when, on the information available, there was every prospect of a successful remedy, the central bank would have been pilloried for causing unnecessary loss to depositors.

The Bank of England was censured by the Bingham report on the closure of BCCI.

Mr Leigh-Pemberton said there had been a strengthening of the Bank's supervisory team and structures. He said the measures were not designed to change the overall approach to supervision but to ensure that the Bank was more sensitive to any suggestion of malpractice.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in