Bad spelling uncovers scam
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Details of an elaborate scheme to steal money from the banking system emerged yesterday as the Serious Fraud Office secured a conviction against the scam's organisers and "stooge" recipients of almost pounds 2m of fraudulent money transfers. The scheme, which ended after a high-speed car chase across Oxfordshire, was foiled after a simple spelling mistake linked 131 forged letters around the country.
Richard Culverhouse, 53, was yesterday found guilty of obtaining property by deception in the case brought by the SFO and the West Midlands Police fraud squad. Seven others, who had allowed their accounts to be used to receive falsely authorised transfers, pleaded guilty, as did the scam's five organisers.
Between December 1995 and May 1996 they forged letters of authority from customers of one bank to transfer funds to an account at another bank. The details were obtained by asking the victim companies for their bank account information, under the pretext of setting up a payment under the Clearing House Automated Payment System, and by researching letterheads and directors' signatures at Companies House.
Despite operating in more than 20 different police areas to try and keep one step ahead of the SFO and the police, the letters of authority were linked by the consistent mis-spelling of the word "sincerely" when signing off the correspondence.
At the peak of the scheme, the perpetrators were seeking to obtain more than pounds 1m a month.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments