Astra sale defended: Rumbling over BAe purchase
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.MICHAEL JORDAN, senior partner at the leading insolvency firm Cork Gully, has defended its decision to sell one of Britain's largest munitions manufacturers to British Aerospace for pounds 8m, following claims from failed bidders that they were prepared to offer more.
In a letter to to one of the bidders, Graham Rushworth, Mr Jordan writes that the 'administrative receivers exercised their independent commercial judgement to achieve a sale at the best price on the offers made to them, and the evidence clearly demonstrates this judgement was made properly and correctly'.
Mr Rushworth had complained to Mr Jordan that Cork Gully did not give due consideration to his consortium's offer for BMARC, a former subsidiary of Astra, the collapsed UK defence company. He claims that his consortium offered pounds 12.7m for the company and was prepared to increase the cash element of that bid to match British Aerospace.
But Mr Jordan says that Mr Rushworth's offer, made on behalf of an Anglo-Austrian consortium, was the only one that did not include a firm cash figure for BMARC's stocks.
Mr Rushworth has replied to Mr Jordan, stating that 'my own view is that your firm, for whatever reason, chose to favour Royal Ordnance plc (a subsidiary of British Aerospace).
'We are considering, therefore, what further remedies are open to us.'
The Office of Fair Trading is investigating the sale, which gives British Aerospace a virtual monopoly of the UK munitions market.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments