Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

An unexpected snag for BA's link-up

Tuesday 20 August 1996 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

British Airways' proposed tie-up with American Airlines would appear to have hit a pocket of turbulence that neither side had been expecting. It is well known that the President of the Board of Trade, Ian Lang, the Office of Fair Trading and almost every airline in Britain and the US other than the bride and groom have the deepest of reservations. But at least it seemed that Sir George Young, the Transport Secretary, was on BA's side. Until now.

The go-ahead for the BA-American alliance is contingent upon Britain and the US agreeing a wider "open-skies" deal across the Atlantic after some five years of on-off negotiations. Without one, the other cannot happen since the price for allowing the two dominant transatlantic carriers to jump into bed is to give everyone else, notably other US airlines, a better crack at the market.

Sir George's negotiators, however, appear to be playing hardball with their opposite numbers in the US. In advance of resumption of talks next week, they have told their American counterparts that the deal being demanded by the US - fifth freedom rights to fly into Heathrow, pick up and then continue on to anywhere in Europe - is unacceptable unless the US grants cabotage to UK airlines - that is the right to operate domestic US services.

Now this may simply be posturing, a negotiating stance to extract the best deal for Britain. But the UK dropped cabotage from its wish list many moons ago and so it is not an issue, except to Virgin Atlantic. All very odd.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in