Aerospace industry 'must have pounds 1bn injection'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE GOVERNMENT must fund a pounds 1bn expansion of Britain's aerospace research budget over the next decade or see the industry go into long-term decline, a cross-party committee of MPs was told yesterday, writes Michael Harrison.
The warning came from Roy McNulty, president of Shorts, the Belfast aerospace company. He said that government R&D spending on aerospace needed to increase from the present pounds 25m a year to pounds 100m within five years, with industry making an equal contribution.
Giving evidence to the Commons' Trade and Industry Select Committee, Mr McNulty said that if government support was not significantly enhanced, Britain would fall a long way down the aerospace league over the next 10 to 15 years.
In separate written evidence, Shorts criticised the Department of Trade and Industry, saying: 'Whether in launch aid, in the absence of a national technology strategy, in R&D funding or in marketing support (it) fails to measure up to the best provided elsewhere for our competitors.'
Meanwhile, a row is set to break out next week between Europe and the US over civil aircraft subsidies for Airbus Industrie and its US rivals, Boeing and McDonnell Douglas.
Michel Dechelotte, director of international planning at Airbus, told MPs that Europe had evidence that the US was breaching the terms of an agreement to limit aid to manufacturers.
Under the agreement, direct launch aid must be limited to 33 per cent of a the cost of a new aircraft, while indirect aid in the form of R&D funding must not exceed 4 per cent of a manufacturer's turnover.
Evidence that the US is breaching the 4 per cent ceiling is expected to be presented by EC trade officials when they meet US officials in Brussels next week to review the agreement.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments