Action group planned for BES investors
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A FIRM of chartered accountants has linked up with a leading firm of City solicitors to set up an action group trying to win compensation from Barclays de Zoete Wedd, the securities arm of Barclays Bank.
Gordon Leighton and solicitors Brook Blaine Russell & Quinn are teaming up to try and help 4,000 investors in the Gracechurch business expansion scheme, who lost out because the Government banned one of the main tax breaks associated with the BES before shares in the scheme could be successfully issued.
The Gracechurch BES offered investors a 'loan-back' after six months. This guaranteed a return of 14 per cent after just six months' investment in the scheme, which is designed to run for five years. However, the scheme was one of a number caught out when the Chancellor removed tax relief from loan-backs in last year's March Budget.
Although the issue closed weeks before the Budget deadline, shares in the scheme were not deemed to have been properly issued until they were recorded on the share register. This occurred after the Budget deadline had passed.
Investors were not able to benefit from the loan-back and keep their tax relief. Barclays de Zoete Wedd tried but failed to have the ruling overturned in the House of Lords.
Andrew White, a senior accountant at Gordon Leighton, does not believe that Barclays' offer to investors of their money back plus 5 per cent interest is enough compensation. The bank has also offered investors who stay in for the full five years an increased return.
Mr White said: 'This completely fails to address the main point at issue, which was that there were many schemes of similar type around at the time, and that investors have lost out by investing with a company that simply failed to issue the shares in time.'
He said that NatWest was offering BES investors who were caught by the same ruling full compensation. One investor who is aggrieved by his treatment at the hands of Barclays is Jonathan Massing, a corporate financier who invested pounds 10,000 in the scheme.
He said: 'The scheme was being marketed through the bank's branch network.
The major selling point was that you would be able to walk away after six months. The issue closed a long way ahead of the deadline. It was their incompetence that meant that the shares were not issued in time.'
Barclays said investors took the risk that the tax relief could be removed in the Budget.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments