Acquitted Lord Spens awarded pounds 350,000 legal costs
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.LORD SPENS, the merchant banker accused of fraud because of his involvement in the Guinness affair, was granted his legal costs of more than pounds 350,000 yesterday as he was formally acquitted at Newcastle Crown Court, writes Paul Durman.
The High Court ordered Lord Spens's acquittal last November but legal formalities required a further appearance before Mr Justice Henry, the Guinness trial judge who is on a tour of duty in Newcastle. Lord Spens's application for costs had been turned down by the High Court last November.
Lord Spens, 50, was head of corporate finance at Henry Ansbacher at the time of Guinness's takeover of Distillers in 1986. The fraud and false accounting charges he faced arose from Guinness's illegal share support operation.
Lord Spens was denied a chance to demonstrate his innocence by the collapse of the second Guinness trial in February last year. The trial ended because of an alarming deterioration in the health of Roger Seelig, Lord Spens's co-defendant, who was suffering under the strain of conducting his own defence.
Although the judge accepted that the collapse of the trial was due to no fault of Lord Spens, he initially ordered that the indictment against him should lie on the file, saying he had brought the prosecution on himself. Lord Spens fought on and eventually overturned that decision. He estimates the prosecution has cost him a total of pounds 750,000 - he was forced to sell a treasured stamp collection.
Lord Spens has become a trenchant critic of the Serious Fraud Office, which he has described as 'a cowboy outfit with a gunslinger mentality'. He has accused the authorities of 'burglaries, phone taps, harassment and overt threats to me and my colleagues'. He is also suing the Bank of England for bringing about the loss of his job at Henry Ansbacher.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments