British motorists driven round bend by poor road signs
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Britain's road signs are a national disgrace which costs the economy millions of pounds a year, says a leading motoring organisation. The British Road Federation, which represents 13 million motorists, says two-thirds of road signs within the M25 are illegible, inaccurate or inconsistent.
Although London is the worst region, the federation says that the problem extends to many other parts of the country. The A556 in Cheshire, the M61/M63 in the North-west, the A38M in Birmingham and the Leeds inner- city ring-road are also picked out for criticism.
The federation's criticisms are included in a report called "Signing: the case for investment". It says good signing contributes towards reduced speeds, reduced congestion and fewer accidents. Mark Glover, the report's author, says the cost of poor singing is estimated at pounds 35m a year in London alone.
The costs include lorries getting lost, businesspeople arriving late for meetings and a higher rate of accidents.
The report has won the backing of the Royal Automobile Club. Kevin Delaney, the RAC's traffic and road-safety manager said: "The lack of investment in signing is not only short-sighted. It is a national disgrace. Good signing is a highly cost-effective means of improving road safety and reducing congestion and pollution."
The report criticises the Government's decision to postpone the London Resigning Project, which was due to start earlier this year at a cost of pounds 17.6m.
It was postponed due to lack of funds. The federation says the programme should be reinstated in the next financial year. It calls for the Government to release funds to local authorities to implement minor works and local safety schemes. It also advises the Government to take advantage of more modern materials which improve the "reflectability" of road signs, making them easier to see, especially at night.
"Road signing in London is appalling," the british Road Federation's Mark Glover said. "The signs at the Elephant and Castle, for example, one of London's busiest junctions, are in a terrible state." Mr Glover said that almost every sign at the roundabout, in south London, was of poor quality. Some were out of date, illegible or in permanent darkness. Others were rendered useless by peeling paint or were covered in graffiti.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments