Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

British 'malaria zone' set to defy NHS drug ban

Liz Hunt
Thursday 01 August 1996 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A London health authority is on collision course with the Government over its plan to defy the ban on prescribing anti-malarial drugs on NHS prescription.

The Lambeth, Southwark and Lewisham Health Authority, says it is vital that its GPs should be able to make the drugs available to the local population, many of whom travel frequently to Africa. Four times as many cases of malaria, a potentially life-threatening disease, are reported in south- east London as in the rest of England and Wales.

The authority has the backing of local medical and pharmaceutical committees, and pharmacists have been assured that they will be reimbursed if they dispense the drugs.

However, a spokeswoman for the Department of Health said yesterday that the authority would be breaking the law if it went ahead. "They are going to have to rethink their policy because it is illegal," she said.

Under regulations which came into effect in February last year, a GP can only write a private prescription for anti-malarial drugs. The Government's attitude is that if people can afford foreign holidays then they should budget for the drugs. Anti-malarials which have other clinical uses, such as the treatment of gout, can be prescribed on an NHS prescription, but for those conditions only.

A health authority spokeswoman said discussions with the Department were under way, but denied it was acting illegally. "Our understanding is that the Department has guidelines, not regulations, on this."

Simon Hughes, spokesman on health for the Liberal Democrats, whose brother Richard died of malaria after returning from honeymoon in Kenya in 1992, welcomed the health authority's decision, and hailed it as a "landmark" policy.

He urged other authorities to follow suit, and said that free anti-malarial drugs would not only prevent malaria, but would also save money spent on hospital treatment in this country.

"The Government must take this message very seriously. If it does not restore free travel vaccines, then health authorities will do so even if they have to break the law to do it," he said. "I call on other health authorities to follow the brave lead set by Lambeth, Southwark and Lewisham, for the public health, but also for financial savings."

A survey by the health authority found that in 1995, 270 cases were identified in its area, of which only 75 were formally reported.

Most of the victims were British residents of African descent who caught the illness while on trips to Nigeria, Ghana or Uganda. They often had not taken precautions because they believed themselves immune after previously living in a malarial country.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in