Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.GUY SNOWDEN, a US businessman, yesterday lost his appeal against a High Court jury's finding that he libelled the Virgin boss, Richard Branson.
Mr Branson won pounds 100,000 damages last year over a bribe Mr Snowden allegedly offered him to withdraw his rival bid to run the National Lottery.
The American was seeking a retrial of the libel action in which Mr Branson sued him over his rejection of bribery allegations that the Virgin chief made on a BBC Panorama programme in 1995.
Mr Snowden was also refused a retrial of his own libel action against Mr Branson's claim that he was offered a bribe during lunch at his home in 1993. That case gave rise to the famous "loo note", a brief resume of the bribery attempt jotted down by Mr Branson while in the bathroom.
Neither Mr Branson nor Mr Snowden were in court yesterday. A spokesman for the American said he was "disappointed" by the decision. "In hindsight, I wish I had not accepted Mr Branson's invitation to lunch," Mr Snowden said in a statement.
After the hearing Mr Branson said: "I am very happy that the court has rejected Guy Snowden's appeal."
Mr Branson said the case showed the danger of allowing a profit-making lottery to be owned by companies that are its key suppliers.
"The prize was so great that Guy Snowden was prepared to go to extreme lengths to succeed," he said.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments