Blood alert for hospital chiefs
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.ALL HOSPITALS are being asked to review their procedures for handling blood after a study revealed 169 cases in which errors had been made, putting patients at risk.
In 12 cases, patients died and in a further 39 suffered serious injury requiring treatment in intensive care or dialysis for kidney failure.
The findings are contained in the first annual report by the Serious Hazards of Transfusion group (Shot) set up by professional groups independently of the National Blood Service to monitor the safety of blood transfusion.
About 3 million blood transfusions are carried out each year, the vast majority without problems, but when problems do occur they tend to follow a pattern, the Shot committee said. The commonest error, accounting for almost half the cases, was a mix-up in which blood intended for one patient was given to another. Blood for transfusions has to be carefully matched to avoid triggering a serious reaction.
There have been a series of scares about the safety of blood for transfusion in the UK involving fears about possible contamination and transmission of viruses including HIV and hepatitis. The results of the Shot study revealed three cases of bacterial contamination - one because the donor's arm had not been properly cleaned - and five in which an infection was transmitted; hepatitis A, B and C, HIV and malaria.
Three of the infections, including that with HIV, occurred as a result of donations during the "window" period - after the donor had been infected but before it showed up in routine tests.
Dr Lorna Williamson, chair of the Shot working group, said new tests were being developed to reduce the window period during which infections were undetectable. "We are dealing with very rare events but it is important that hospitals are still vigilant," she said.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments