Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Black actors confuse police trainees

Jason Bennetto,Crime Correspondent
Monday 04 August 1997 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Hundreds of police officers are to be given a second chance to take promotion examinations after failing because they were unable to deal with black actors pretending to be traffic wardens.

The 13 ethnic minority actors who took part in the national examinations were told last week their role was being axed. But the Home Office announced last night that it was reversing the decision and that the exams using black people would continue.

An organisation representing black officers yesterday said the affair was very worrying and raised wider issues about police attitudes to race.

The controversy follows last year's sergeants' exams which used black actors for the first time - about half the 3,200 tests involved black actors in one exercise. The Police Promotions Examinations Board decided to drop the practice after a psychologist told them officers had performed better when dealing with white actors and that this may be because race was confusing them.

The Home Office and police associations yesterday criticised the move by the official training body, even though their representatives were on the board that made the original decision to stop using black actors.

The board had written in the past few weeks to the 13 actors involved to say they would not be used in the practical part of the examinations so that the exercises could be "standardised".

It followed a survey of the previous year's results by an occupational psychologist who found there were "significant differences in performance" by those candidates who had to deal with black actors and those who had white actors. The board decided that many officers believed the examination was to test equal opportunities skills, rather than their knowledge of road laws.

As a result, the board decided to scrap the results of that section of the exam and give all officers who failed another chance. This will affect about 800 of the officers who failed.

Leroy Logan, of the Black Police Association, said yesterday: "While we agree that there is some merit in the findings of the psychologist we would argue that the real issue here is the apparent inability of some candidates to relate to black people without seeing colour as the issue.

"If this is happening in the controlled situation of an exam, then how might their perceptions be translated in real operational situations?"

A spokeswoman for the Home Office said: "It was a misguided attempt to standardise the examinations. It is clearly unacceptable. Steps are being taken to reverse the decision and reinstate the ethnic minority role players." Spokesmen for the Association of Chief Police Officers and the Police Federation welcomed the decision to overturn the move. However, there remains confusion about who authorised the original policy when the Home Office, Federation and Acpo all have members on the board.

The head of the Police Promotions Examinations Unit in Harrogate, Superintendent Glenn Hutton, acknowledged that there had been a "hiccup" in its procedures. but he said it was a misunderstanding about how the exam system worked.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in