Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Billion-dollar bill for secret bounty

US EXPERIENCE

Rupert Cornwell
Thursday 13 June 1996 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

It is as old as time, and as ineradicable as sin. It costs United States taxpayers anything from $10bn (pounds 6.5bn) to $100bn (pounds 65bn) a year, depending on how it is defined. It is "pork", unnecessary spending to humour a Congressman or Senator, paid from the central federal budget.

Pork is the business of the other, secret Congress: not the place of the wordy, self-promoting politicians whose favourite prop is a television camera, but of arcane backroom committee rooms, where special interests are accommodated, votes bought and deals struck.

The term has been part of the US's political vocabulary at least since 1870. It embraces items in appropriations bills - in state, city as well as federal budgets - which are targeted to local ends. The pork-barrel's bounty ranges from the absurd ($5m for research into Belgian endives, or $65m for a museum of old trains in Scranton, Pennsylvania) to the colossal (B-2 bombers and Seawolf nuclear submarines at $2bn apiece).

Now this should be a bad time for pork; scarcely a week passes without the White House or Congress issuing a plan to balance the federal budget, while so outraged are Republican deficit hawks by Washington's feckless ways that they want to eliminate entire departments of government.

Behind the noble words, everyone is an accomplice. For members of Congress, securing pork is the best way of showing voters back home they are delivering the goods. Both Republicans and Democrats go along. The White House, too, plays the game, promising favours to powerful interest groups, or key states in the electoral college.

Pork indeed has its defenders. Without it, this camp insists, compromise could never be reached in a Congress where party discipline is minimal compared with Britain.

But as George Bernard Shaw noted: "A government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always count on the vote of Paul."

Simple beginnings

The term pork-barrel politics derives from the pre-civil war custom of periodically distributing barrels of salt pork to slaves, who would each rush to grab the largest possible amount.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in