BBC advisers say it is pro-Labour
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The BBC confirmed last night that two of its own advisers have accused the corporation of showing bias towards the Labour Party during interviews.
They said the Corporation allowed leading Labour politicians and advisers to have an easy ride on flagship programmes.
Lord Skidelsky, a former SDP peer who now supports the left of the Conservative Party and Green Party activist Jean Lambert, gave their views in a report to the BBC following an open forum for the corporation's journalists.
The two found that Labour politicians and advisers were let off the hook by interviewers, who failed to press them on important points of policy. The independent observers say Peter Mandelson, political adviser to Labour leader Tony Blair, should have been more closely questioned about his view that there should be "super ministries" to oversee Whitehall.
The BBC stressed that the minutes are not policy documents but confirmed they are passed to the director-general. A BBC spokesman confirmed that Lord Sidelsky and Ms Lambert had expressed these views and said they were part of an ongoing exercise. "We wanted views that were independent and challenging. What they said is what they feel. This was one of a number of seminars. We will be getting other views from other people and until we have considered them all it would be wrong to comment about them," he added.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments